Comparing Writers' Ideas and Perspectives

    OCR
    GCSE

    Candidates must synthesise evidence from two distinct texts to identify convergent and divergent perspectives. The assessment demands a granular analysis of how writers utilize tone, register, and rhetorical devices to convey their viewpoints. Responses must move beyond simple content matching to explore the nuances of the writers' attitudes and the specific contexts influencing their ideas. High-scoring responses seamlessly integrate textual detail to evaluate the impact of temporal and cultural shifts on the writers' perspectives.

    0
    Objectives
    4
    Exam Tips
    4
    Pitfalls
    3
    Key Terms
    4
    Mark Points

    What You Need to Demonstrate

    Key skills and knowledge for this topic

    • Credit responses that identify and compare the writers' specific perspectives, attitudes, or viewpoints, not just the content of the texts.
    • Award marks for the analysis of how methods (language, structure, tone) are used differently or similarly to convey these perspectives.
    • Reward the judicious selection of quotations from both texts that directly support the comparative argument.
    • Credit a balanced approach that integrates analysis of both texts within the same paragraph using comparative connectives.

    Marking Points

    Key points examiners look for in your answers

    • Credit responses that identify and compare the writers' specific perspectives, attitudes, or viewpoints, not just the content of the texts.
    • Award marks for the analysis of how methods (language, structure, tone) are used differently or similarly to convey these perspectives.
    • Reward the judicious selection of quotations from both texts that directly support the comparative argument.
    • Credit a balanced approach that integrates analysis of both texts within the same paragraph using comparative connectives.

    Examiner Tips

    Expert advice for maximising your marks

    • 💡Start every paragraph with a comparative connective (e.g., 'Conversely', 'Similarly', 'In contrast') to force integration.
    • 💡Identify the 'Big Idea' (tone and purpose) of each text before writing to ensure the comparison focuses on perspective.
    • 💡Allocate 20-25 minutes for this question as it carries significant weight (12 marks) and demands synthesis.
    • 💡Ensure quotations are short and embedded to maintain the flow of the comparative argument.

    Common Mistakes

    Pitfalls to avoid in your exam answers

    • Describing the texts separately (Text A then Text B) without integrating the comparison.
    • Comparing the events or characters described rather than the writers' perspectives on them.
    • Listing literary devices (feature-spotting) without explaining how they convey the writer's attitude.
    • Failing to identify the nuance in tone (e.g., missing that one text is satirical while the other is serious).

    Key Terminology

    Essential terms to know

    Synthesising explicit and implicit ideas across texts
    Comparative analysis of writers' perspectives and attitudes
    Evaluation of methods used to convey viewpoints (tone, register, rhetoric)

    Likely Command Words

    How questions on this topic are typically asked

    Compare how
    Evaluate how far
    Explore how
    Identify
    Write a

    Ready to test yourself?

    Practice questions tailored to this topic