Candidates must analyze sociological explanations of crime and deviance, distinguishing between structural, subcultural, and interactionist approaches. The study necessitates a critical evaluation of Functionalist consensus narratives (Durkheim, Merton) against Marxist conflict theories (Gordon, Snider) and Interactionist micro-sociology (Becker, Lemert). Proficiency requires assessing the utility of these theories in explaining contemporary crime trends, class disparities, and the social construction of official statistics (AO1/AO2), while evaluating their deterministic or voluntaristic nature (AO3).
Key skills and knowledge for this topic
Key points examiners look for in your answers
Expert advice for maximising your marks
Pitfalls to avoid in your exam answers
Essential terms to know
How questions on this topic are typically asked
Practice questions tailored to this topic