Proof

    OCR
    GCSE

    Proof in Further Mathematics necessitates the construction of rigorous logical arguments to establish the universal validity of mathematical conjectures. Candidates must demonstrate mastery of formal methods, specifically Proof by Mathematical Induction, Proof by Contradiction, and Disproof by Counter-example, applied across diverse contexts such as number theory, matrices, and series. Success requires precise algebraic manipulation, the correct use of logical connectives, and the ability to structure arguments where every step is explicitly justified by established axioms or prior results.

    0
    Objectives
    7
    Exam Tips
    8
    Pitfalls
    9
    Key Terms
    9
    Mark Points

    Subtopics in this area

    Proof
    Proof

    What You Need to Demonstrate

    Key skills and knowledge for this topic

    • Award B1 for correctly verifying the base case (usually n=1) with explicit substitution
    • Award M1 for stating the inductive hypothesis: 'Assume true for n=k'
    • Award M1 for attempting the inductive step n=k+1 using the assumption
    • Award A1 for correct algebraic manipulation leading to the required form for k+1
    • Award A1 for the final completion statement: 'True for n=1, and if true for n=k then true for n=k+1, therefore true for all positive integers n'
    • Award M1 for correctly defining algebraic terms (e.g., 'Let 2n be an even integer' or 'Let n and n+1 be consecutive integers')
    • Award M1 for correct algebraic manipulation, such as expanding double brackets or factorising expressions fully
    • Award A1 for reaching a convincing intermediate form (e.g., showing '4(n^2 + n)' to demonstrate divisibility by 4)

    Example Examiner Feedback

    Real feedback patterns examiners use when marking

    • "You have correctly shown the algebra for n=k+1, but you missed the final concluding statement required for the full marks."
    • "Check your matrix multiplication order; remember that matrix multiplication is not commutative."
    • "You assumed the result is true for n=k, but you didn't explicitly state this assumption in writing."
    • "Excellent algebraic structure, but ensure you define any new integers introduced (e.g., 'where M is an integer') for divisibility proofs."
    • "You have verified this for n=1 and n=2, but a proof must work for *all* values — use 'n' instead of numbers"
    • "Your algebra is correct, but you lost the final mark. Add a sentence starting with 'Therefore...' to explain what your result shows"
    • "Do not move terms from LHS to RHS. Start with the LHS and manipulate it until it looks exactly like the RHS"
    • "To prove this is always positive, try completing the square rather than just substituting values"

    Marking Points

    Key points examiners look for in your answers

    • Award B1 for correctly verifying the base case (usually n=1) with explicit substitution
    • Award M1 for stating the inductive hypothesis: 'Assume true for n=k'
    • Award M1 for attempting the inductive step n=k+1 using the assumption
    • Award A1 for correct algebraic manipulation leading to the required form for k+1
    • Award A1 for the final completion statement: 'True for n=1, and if true for n=k then true for n=k+1, therefore true for all positive integers n'
    • Award M1 for correctly defining algebraic terms (e.g., 'Let 2n be an even integer' or 'Let n and n+1 be consecutive integers')
    • Award M1 for correct algebraic manipulation, such as expanding double brackets or factorising expressions fully
    • Award A1 for reaching a convincing intermediate form (e.g., showing '4(n^2 + n)' to demonstrate divisibility by 4)
    • Award A1/B1 (dependent) for a rigorous concluding statement that explicitly links the final algebraic form to the required proof (e.g., 'Since k is an integer, 2k+1 is always odd')

    Examiner Tips

    Expert advice for maximising your marks

    • 💡Memorise the OCR-approved conclusion template for induction; losing the final A1 mark due to wording is a preventable error
    • 💡When proving divisibility, explicitly write f(k+1) - f(k) or f(k+1) - m*f(k) to isolate the divisible term
    • 💡For 'Show that' questions involving proof, you must show every line of working; skipping algebraic steps will result in loss of marks
    • 💡In proof by contradiction, clearly state the negation of the statement at the very start
    • 💡When asked to prove an expression is 'positive for all real values', immediately think of completing the square to show the result is of the form (x+a)^2 + b where b > 0
    • 💡Never skip steps in algebraic expansion; examiners need to see the unsimplified expansion to award Method marks if the final answer is incorrect
    • 💡Memorise the standard definitions: Even = 2n, Odd = 2n+1, Consecutive = n, n+1. Using 'n' for an odd number is a fatal error

    Common Mistakes

    Pitfalls to avoid in your exam answers

    • Omitting the 'if... then...' logic in the final conclusion, simply stating 'true for all n' without justifying the inductive link
    • In matrix induction, incorrectly assuming commutativity (e.g., writing M^(k+1) = M^k * M and M * M^k interchangeably without justification)
    • For divisibility proofs, failing to define an integer multiplier (e.g., writing f(k) = 7m without stating 'where m is an integer')
    • Algebraic errors when factorising the (k+1) expression, particularly with indices or factorials
    • Substituting specific numerical values (e.g., n=1, n=2) to 'prove' a general statement, which earns zero credit for the proof itself
    • Working across the equals sign when proving an identity (treating it like an equation to solve) rather than manipulating one side to match the other
    • Omitting the final conclusion; candidates often perform the algebra correctly but fail to state 'Therefore, the expression is a multiple of 9'
    • Circular reasoning: assuming the statement is true at the start of the proof to derive a truth (e.g., 0=0)

    Study Guide Available

    Comprehensive revision notes & examples

    Key Terminology

    Essential terms to know

    Proof by Mathematical Induction (Series, Divisibility, Matrices)
    Proof by Contradiction (Irrationality, Infinity of Primes)
    Disproof by Counter-example
    Deduction and Exhaustion
    Mathematical Induction (Series, Divisibility, Matrices)
    Proof by Deduction
    Proof by Contradiction
    Disproof by Counter-example
    Logical Connectives and Set Notation

    Likely Command Words

    How questions on this topic are typically asked

    Prove
    Show that
    Deduce
    Determine
    Verify
    Explain
    Find

    Ready to test yourself?

    Practice questions tailored to this topic