The Existence of God

    This study guide explores the classical arguments for and against the existence of God, a central theme in WJEC GCSE Religious Studies. It delves into philosophical proofs like the Design and Cosmological arguments, confronts the powerful challenge of the Problem of Evil, and evaluates the relationship between science and faith, equipping students to tackle high-mark evaluation questions.

    6
    Min Read
    3
    Examples
    3
    Questions
    6
    Key Terms
    🎙 Podcast Episode
    The Existence of God
    5:52
    0:00-5:52

    Study Notes

    Header image for The Existence of God

    Overview

    This unit explores the fundamental philosophical questions surrounding the existence of God, a cornerstone of WJEC Unit 1. Examiners expect candidates to move beyond simple descriptions of arguments to a sophisticated evaluation of their strengths and weaknesses. This involves analysing the classical Teleological and Cosmological arguments, contrasting them with scientific theories like the Big Bang and Evolution, and grappling with the significant challenge posed by the Problem of Evil. A key skill is the ability to use Sources of Wisdom and Authority, such as the Bible, and to understand how different Christian and Jewish perspectives might interpret these complex ideas. High-level responses will demonstrate nuance, for instance, by discussing how faith and science can be seen as compatible, rather than mutually exclusive. This guide will equip you with the specific knowledge, analytical frameworks, and exam techniques needed to achieve the highest marks.

    Key Arguments & Concepts

    The Teleological Argument (The Design Argument)

    What it is: This argument claims that the universe displays such intricate order, purpose, and complexity that it must have been designed by an intelligent creator. The intricacy of a human eye or the regular orbits of planets are not seen as products of random chance.

    Why it matters: This is a classic argument that examiners love to see discussed. It is an a posteriori argument, meaning it is based on empirical evidence and observation of the world.

    Specific Knowledge: William Paley (1802) and his Watchmaker Analogy are essential. If you found a watch, you would infer a watchmaker. Similarly, the complexity of the universe implies a Divine Watchmaker. Also, Psalm 19:1: "The heavens declare the glory of God; the skies proclaim the work of his hands."

    The Cosmological Argument (The First Cause Argument)

    What it is: This argument posits that everything that exists must have a cause. This chain of cause-and-effect cannot go back infinitely; there must have been a first, uncaused cause that started everything. This First Cause is identified as God.

    Why it matters: Like the Teleological argument, this is a foundational concept for this topic. It provides a logical framework for God as the initiator of the universe.

    Specific Knowledge: St. Thomas Aquinas (c. 1225-1274) and his Five Ways. The first three ways (the Unmoved Mover, the First Cause, the Argument from Contingency) are all versions of the Cosmological Argument. Genesis 1:1: "In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth."

    Comparison of Key Arguments

    The Problem of Evil

    What it is: This is the primary argument against the existence of a classical theistic God. It questions how an all-powerful (omnipotent) and all-good (omnibenevolent) God can coexist with the evil and suffering present in the world.

    Why it matters: This is the most common and powerful counter-argument. Your ability to explain and evaluate it is crucial for achieving high marks in 15-mark questions.

    Specific Knowledge: The Inconsistent Triad, as formulated by philosopher J.L. Mackie. The three points are: God is Omnipotent, God is Omnibenevolent, and Evil Exists. Mackie argues these three statements cannot logically co-exist. You must also distinguish between Moral Evil (suffering caused by humans, e.g., war, murder) and Natural Evil (suffering caused by the natural world, e.g., earthquakes, disease).

    The Inconsistent Triad

    Scientific Explanations

    What it is: Scientific theories like the Big Bang Theory and the Theory of Evolution by Natural Selection offer alternative explanations for the origins of the universe and life, which do not require a divine creator.

    Why it matters: Candidates are expected to evaluate the relationship between science and religion. A common mistake is to present them as being in total conflict. High-level responses will explore the idea of compatibility.

    Specific Knowledge: The Big Bang Theory states the universe began from a hot, dense point around 13.8 billion years ago. Evolution explains the development of life through processes like natural selection and genetic mutation. A key concept is Theistic Evolution, the view that God used these scientific processes as the mechanism for creation.

    Key Individuals

    William Paley

    Role: Christian philosopher and author of the Watchmaker analogy.

    Key Actions: In his book Natural Theology (1802), he articulated the most famous version of the Teleological Argument.

    Impact: His analogy remains the most accessible and widely-cited example of the Design Argument, making it essential knowledge for this topic.

    St. Thomas Aquinas

    Role: Influential medieval philosopher and theologian.

    Key Actions: Formulated the 'Five Ways,' which are five logical arguments for the existence of God. The first three form the basis of the Cosmological Argument.

    Impact: Aquinas provided the philosophical bedrock for many Christian arguments for God's existence. His work is a cornerstone of Catholic theology and a key source of wisdom for exam answers.

    J.L. Mackie

    Role: 20th-century Australian philosopher.

    Key Actions: Developed the 'Inconsistent Triad' to logically formulate the Problem of Evil.

    Impact: Mackie provided a clear, logical framework for the Problem of Evil, which is now a standard part of the philosophical debate and a required element for GCSE evaluation.

    Visual Resources

    2 diagrams and illustrations

    The Inconsistent Triad
    The Inconsistent Triad
    Comparison of Key Arguments
    Comparison of Key Arguments

    Interactive Diagrams

    2 interactive diagrams to visualise key concepts

    YesNoUniverse shows COMPLEXITY & ORDERDoes this require a designer?Teleological Argument: God is the DesignerArgument from Chance / EvolutionSupported by Paley's Watch & Psalm 19:1

    Flowchart of the Teleological (Design) Argument

    Problem of EvilContradictsContradictsandGod is OmnipotentEvil ExistsGod is OmnibenevolentJ.L. Mackie's Inconsistent Triad

    Diagram of the Inconsistent Triad

    Worked Examples

    3 detailed examples with solutions and examiner commentary

    Practice Questions

    Test your understanding — click to reveal model answers

    Q1

    Explain two reasons why a religious person might believe in God. (5 marks)

    5 marks
    standard

    Hint: Think about the classical arguments and try to link one to a Source of Wisdom.

    Q2

    Describe the difference between the Cosmological and Teleological arguments. (8 marks)

    8 marks
    standard

    Hint: Focus on the core logic of each argument: one is about cause, the other is about complexity.

    Q3

    "[Scientific theories] make belief in God impossible." Discuss this statement. (15 marks)

    15 marks
    challenging

    Hint: Avoid a simple 'science vs religion' debate. Discuss compatibility and the idea of Theistic Evolution.

    Key Terms

    Essential vocabulary to know

    More Religious Studies Study Guides

    View all

    Sources of Authority (e.g., sacred texts, religious leaders)

    WJEC
    GCSE

    This guide explores the crucial topic of 'Sources of Authority' for WJEC GCSE Religious Studies, examining how sacred texts, religious leaders, and conscience guide believers. Mastering this is key to unlocking top marks by understanding the foundations of religious decision-making.

    Sources of Authority

    WJEC
    GCSE

    This study guide delves into the crucial topic of Sources of Wisdom and Authority (SoWA) for WJEC GCSE Religious Studies. Mastering how believers use sacred texts, leaders, and conscience is essential for top marks across all exam themes, making this a high-yield area for revision."

    Applying religious teachings to real-life situations

    OCR
    GCSE

    This study guide for OCR GCSE Religious Studies focuses on the crucial skill of applying religious teachings to real-life situations. It provides a framework for analyzing contemporary ethical issues through the lens of Christian Sources of Wisdom and Authority, equipping students to construct high-scoring, analytical responses.

    Aims of Punishment

    Edexcel
    GCSE

    This study guide provides a comprehensive analysis of the four aims of punishment for Edexcel GCSE Religious Studies. It is designed to help students master the key concepts, religious teachings, and exam techniques required to achieve top marks."

    Miracles and Religious Experience

    Edexcel
    GCSE

    This study guide explores the complex and highly-debated topics of miracles and religious experience, crucial for Edexcel GCSE Religious Studies. It provides the key arguments, philosophical challenges, and exam techniques needed to analyse these events as potential proofs for the existence of God."

    Explaining religious beliefs, teachings and practices, using evidence

    Edexcel
    GCSE

    Mastering the skill of explaining religious beliefs, teachings, and practices with evidence from Sources of Wisdom and Authority (SOWA) is essential for achieving top marks in Edexcel GCSE Religious Studies. This guide provides the techniques, structures, and examples you need to substantiate your answers with precision and theological depth.